home

Tuesday, 7 July 2015

How Buhari Is Spending The Excess Crude Account Fund Like Jonathan

Facts have emerged on how Nigeria’s president, Muhammadu Buhari is handling the Excess Crude Account (ECA) like his predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan.
PM News reports say Buhari taken a cue from Jonathan, by takingMONEY from the ECA to share to states in a bid to help ease the financial burden on them.
Buhari Is Spending Excess Crude Account Funds Like GEJ

The Nigerian leader reportedly took money from the ECA to help the financially-burdened states as against the real reason the account was created by former president, Olusegun Obasanjo, in 2004.
The federal government had on Monday, July 6, agreed to share about N391bn ($1.7bn) from the Excess Crude Account among the state governments following their inability to pay their workers’ salaries.
Accountant General of the Federation, Ahmed Idris, had said: “the position is very clear, what we met on ground is what we are going to distribute. What we met on ground is hovering between $1.6bn to $1.7bn, and that is what we are going to distribute among all theTHREE tiers of governments based on the approved formula.”
But, Raymond Omachi, acting chairman of Fiscal Responsibility Commission (FRC) frowned at the practice of the federal government spending the ECA to pay subsidy or to share from the account to states when available funds are not adequate to meet revenue projections.

According to him, the ECA was established in 2004 to protect planned budget against shortfalls due to volatileCRUDE OIL PRICES, and not how the funds from the account are being spent.
“If the ECA had been properly managed, in accordance with the FRC act, the country will not have been embroiled in the liquidity crisis beingPRESENTLY experienced,” he said.
Omachi, who was still furious over the manner of expenditure of the funds from the ECA, state that the FRC Act stated that savings from the ECA should not be accessed untilOIL PRICE falls below the predetermined level for a period of three consecutive months, noting that the sum accessed should be limited to the amount that would bring the revenue of government to the level contained in its budget estimates.
He said: “In essence, the non-compliance with the relevant sections of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2007, is the cause of the financial management problem being experienced by the country in the light of the slidingOIL PRICE.
“If the account had been intact, the effect of decliningOIL PRICE will have been accommodated with the ECA buffer to finance the budget.”

No comments: